Saturday, June 23, 2012

High Unemployment

Europe has a huge mess with unemployment. Well, to be fair, some European countries have a huge mess with unemployment. Yet still, Europe in general has experienced some common trends not seen in US and in average a higher rate of unemployment. Yet not always was it this way. Previous to the 80’s European unemployment had always been lower than in US. It was in the 70’s and early 80’s when things turn around and since then Europe unemployment has been always significantly higher.
The best theoretical explanation of these events was made by Blanchard and Summers 1986 paper, “Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem”. Blanchard and Summers explained that the reasons for that change of pattern were the industrial changes of the 70’s and the raise of long-term unemployment. In short, the 1970’s welfare organization in Europe provided a net for those falling in unemployment. But in a period of industrial change, unemployed people relied too much in welfare and did not realized that the rules of the game had changed forever. They were not going to find the same jobs anymore, because those industries were not there anymore. So, long-term unemployed became chronic in Europe. Inside Europe no other country illustrates unemployment theories better than Spain. Spain’s case has an interesting extremist unemployment market. The roots of which can be found at Franco’s dictatorship that for 35 years had been created a paternalistic, hierarchical and rigid society where changes were hard to make. When in late 70’s Spain got rid of the dictator the global economic changes of the 70’s hit Spain really hard (in fact, any global change would have stroke that rigid society). So, just exactly when Spain was defining itself as a democracy and creating new set of laws, a huge economic crisis stroke and so the Spanish society became paralysed of fear and a military coup d’├ętat. Many necessary changes were indefinitely postponed. Thus, old-fashioned laws let long-term unemployment in Spain become a common situation, much more common than in Europe. Unemployment rates never dwindled below 8% levels, but reached 20% during the 80’s and 90’s crises. In order to decrease long-term unemployment the Government created new temporary contracts that were in many cases applied to some of those long-term unemployed. However, the consequence was that two labour classes were pull apart. One class was for those unemployed or in temporary contracts and the other was for those with permanent contracts or civil-servant positions. This is how Spain became the perfect example of what has been called Dual Economy or Insider-Outsider theory. According to it, Spain’s Insiders are those with permanent jobs and civil-servants and Outsiders are those who are in temporary jobs or unemployed. The first ones are over-protected by labour laws and collective bargaining (another Franco inheritance). Wages and working conditions for workers under permanent contracts are covered by these collective bargaining agreements that protect them. The salary bargains in Spain are made at province and industry level by trade unions and employers’ organizations. Collective agreements have the status of a law, affecting all workers and firms in the relevant area. In consequence, firms can not adjust wages to their own productivity and sacked them or changing their status is very difficult (even more difficult for civil-servants). By contrast, Outsiders have to bear most of the precarious jobs and unemployment periods. Out of the 1.6 million employees to have lost their jobs since mid-2007 till early 2012, 1.4 million had temporary contracts. Today’s unemployment in Spain is outrageous. The latest figure showed at staggering 24.4% unemployment rate, (50% of youth unemployment) by far the highest rate of the developed world. The cause is still the same as in 80’s and 90’s, the Insider-Outsider division. The best way to prove it is by using this chart (modified from NeG):
This chart contradicts the basics of economics and the basics of demand and supply theory. Real average salaries increases in Spain were, since 2007, always above inflation. Even when unemployment reached 24%, salaries increases were above 1%. The only possible explanation of this is the Insider-Outsider theory. How could this situation not be changed? The answer is because Insiders have a lot of political power. Young people and Outsiders in general have been always a minority in Spain (although a big minority). Labour rules were only changed, marginally, three times since 1980 and they all happened when Outsiders were a majority, in 1994, 1997 and 2012. You may ask yourself that if Outsiders’ minority is the problem, Why Netherlands, Germany or Sweden outsiders are not suffering the same or even worse burden? The key point here is, when and how were the rules of the game established. For Spain it was the worst possible moment and that determined the labour market equilibrium of today.

Friday, June 15, 2012

GDP and SP500

I already knew the stable growth path of GDP per capita in US when logarithm is applied in the last century. It has always been around 2% annual increase and the only big exception was the Great Depression. What I never saw before was the evolution of SP500 for those 100 year. It seems according to the chart that, although less stable, the average growth has been 1.9%. This chart was published by and they collected the data from David Shiller and They also note that the 0.1% difference may well be due to the fact that the stock price series were adjusted for inflation using CPI-U while the GDP per Capita was adjusted with the GDP Deflator.

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Real time Easter Expenditures in Spain

The MIT SENSEable City Lab and the BBVA bank, have created this visualization where we can see spending in Spain during Easter of 2011. The movie shows commercial activities of 1.4 million people and 375,000 businesses. In sum, over 4 million transactions in real time.

Friday, June 1, 2012

Creativity and GDP

I am delighted about World Values Survey data. It's just brilliant. They asked 1000 people per country questions related to their social, ethical, moral and economic life. Results are very interesting and give a lot of insight. I tried to find a relation between those questions and GDPpc PPP. I assumed that one of the following questions should have a relation to GDP:

1- It is important to this person living in secure surroundings?
2- It is important to this person adventure and taking risks?
3- It is important to this person to think up new ideas and be creative?
4- How important is work in your life?

We all would thought that the last question should be correlated to GDPpc. But look at this Correlation coef. for 15 developed countries:

question1(inverted) question2 question3 question4
GDPpc PPP 0.32006 0.06363 0.42821 -0.34265
ln GDPpc PPP 0.31429 0.03711 0.47647 -0.37323

'Importance of work' and GDPpc correlation is negative! instead 'Creativity' is the one with a higher coefficient. Isn't it nice? I know this is far from an academic paper but is interesting anyway.